Is the program challenging elementary school perspective. "Perspective"

This issue is especially acute for parents of future first-graders. Everyone wants not to harm either the child or themselves. A survey of acquaintances and study of sites begins in the hope of finding an answer to a question of interest.

Parents face a choice educational program.

But whatever the program, a lot depends on the primary school teacher: teaching style, interest, responsibility, attitude towards children and work. It would probably be fair to say that in elementary school "you need to go to the teacher." So it’s worth learning more about the teachers who will recruit future first graders and.

Let's start by listing the existing programs for the 2017-2018 academic year in Russian schools:

It should also be noted that all curricula are developed in accordance with the CEO, which allows you to master the necessary minimum of knowledge (invariant part of teaching aids) or acceptable for the curious (variable part).

Let's analyze the pros and cons of curriculums in elementary school:

OS "School 2100"

This program is continuous from kindergarten to 11th grade. Covers a large amount of material. The teacher directs and controls the search activity of students. The most difficult subjects are mathematics Kozlova S. A. and the world around Vakhrusheva A. A.
At the moment, the program is limited in the use of schools, since the textbooks were not included in the Federal List, that is, they did not pass the examination of the Ministry of Education.

Pros: students are trained to learn and acquire knowledge. They can easily find the information they need. They write a lot of essays and presentations, essays, they have a broad outlook of knowledge.

Minuses: tasks are feasible for mastering middle and high level students, requires control and assistance from parents. Another disadvantage is that not all middle and high school teachers are ready to continue their education in the 5th grade.

• first of all, parents of future first graders need to focus on the level of development of their child;
• take seriously the choice of a primary school teacher, because a competent, experienced teacher will make any program interesting and useful, and the child will definitely learn it;
• it is also necessary to remember that the success of education depends not only on the teacher, but also on the desire of parents to participate in the life of the student himself, to spend their time and energy.

Hello again! Tired of studying? Not confused in their names and authors? Can you take another one? I want to finally put an end to this issue, but not having completed the study in full, I am not ready to do so. So take heart: today we are discussing the training program Perspective.

Lesson plan:

Another traditional project

The "Perspective" set refers to the traditional system of education in elementary school, and it was developed in 2006 during the formation of the first stage of education.

The educational materials were prepared on the initiative of the author of the project, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences Lyudmila Peterson, together with the Prosveshchenie publishing house. Scientists from academies of education and sciences, practicing teachers and methodologists took part in the "promising" project.

As it should be for any methodological kit used in the educational process at school, "Perspective" has everything you need in its composition:

• alphabet for grade 1 L. Klemanova and the same author Russian;
• mathematician G. Dorofeev;
• literature by V. Goretsky;
• computer science T. Rudnichenko;
• "environment" by A. Pleshakov;
• technology of N. Rogovtseva;
• physical education at the choice of a teacher: either A. Matveeva, or I. Viner;
• ART by T. Shpikalova;
• music by E. Kritskaya;
• fundamentals of religion and ethics in the areas of different cultures.

"Perspective" offers the study of as many as four foreign languages:

• English in standard or advanced programs, as well as in the course "In Focus" or "Star";
• Spanish and German according to the classical program;
• French either at the rate "Your friend ..." or "In the future."

It should be noted that, like many other educational sets of school educational programs, in 2014 Perspektivny faced the problem of obtaining recommendations from the Ministry of Education. The textbooks on mathematics and religion were called into question.

As a result, the mathematical work of L. Peterson "Learning to learn" was replaced, and materials on the study of religions in grades 4-5 were finalized. UMC "Perspektiva" passed the necessary approvals in its entirety.

Long-term goals, or how and what the program teaches

As the basis of her educational project, Lyudmila Peterson took the system of the activity approach developed by her, for which she once received the award of the President of the Russian Federation. Wisely said.

In fact, everything is simple: this is another attempt to combine in school education the developing approach we already know and the established classics through the universal skills to set goals, solve problems and be responsible for results.

The task of such education at school is not to give ready-made information, but to teach the child to discover new knowledge on his own. “I hear - I forget, I see - I remember, I do - I assimilate” - this, I remember, we have already gone through.

As a result of this activity methodology, the Perspektiva educational kit has several directions around which the entire educational “perspective” process revolves:

All of the above areas of student development embodied the ideas of the authors in thematic educational materials: “My planet is the Earth”, “My country is my Fatherland”, “My family is my world”, “Nature and culture is the environment of our life”.

Pros and Cons of Perspective Learning

There are actually not so many reviews on "Perspective", but I noted for myself that there is not much categorical criticism, as in other educational programs, for example, in.

“... they didn’t like the prescriptions: it is problematic for first-graders, after writing from line to line, to subsequently decide in a notebook with the size of letters: capital and capital letters are written the same way ...”,

"... mathematics first studies the multiplication table, without giving the concept of numbers up to 100 ...",

“... how to teach children to read and write if there are mistakes in the ABC?”,

“…exercises in textbooks do not correspond to the topics…”.

But the textbooks for the next grades 3 and 4 are quite suitable for teachers:

"... an interesting world around, but often the help of parents is required ...",

“... mathematics is designed for different children: it is interesting for weak and strong at the same time to work, problems are well presented, one topic involves solving them from 4 to 6 pieces per lesson, strong children can try their hand at solving Olympiad tasks ...”.

Parents' opinions are presented dryly and in a nutshell boil down to the fact that children in the 1st grade are given very little in writing, I would like more, and Dorofeev's mathematics is simple and boring for those who would like to master knowledge at a higher level.

Most of all, parents of schoolchildren are concerned about the continuity of the program during the transition to the secondary level, since it is designed only for primary school.

It was not so easy to express all the pros and cons. Those who want to be “promising” do it, it turns out, almost inaudibly. Such, let's say, a neutral program, not asking for compliments, but also not subject to strong criticisms.

Perhaps being a "gray cardinal" is not so bad as you think?

I hope that I have helped you a little with the complexity of the many educational programs for elementary education. I think this can be put to rest. I say goodbye to you, but not for long.

Always yours, Evgenia Klimkovich.